개굴 스토어

개굴

개인인증

팔로워0 팔로우

소개

등록된 소개글이 없습니다.

전문분야 등록된 전문분야가 없습니다.

판매자 정보

학교정보

입력된 정보가 없습니다.

직장정보

입력된 정보가 없습니다.

자격증

입력된 정보가 없습니다.

판매지수

판매중 자료수

3개
전체 판매량

4개
최근 3개월 판매량

0개
자료후기 점수

-
자료문의 응답률

-

전체자료 3개

Yeats - The second Coming is Not a Rescue, But Another Chaos

********Professor ***ENG ****-**14, November 2019The second Coming is Not a Rescue, But Another ChaosThe poem "The Second Coming" written by Yeats shows the speaker's perception that The Second Coming is just the beginning of another chaos, not salvation. “The Second Coming” shows that even after the contemporary despair, the Second Coming in the future is not a rescue, but mere another chaos. Yeats effectively delivers this idea by frequent symbolism, negative dictions and alliteration. He remarkably uses numerous negative dictions, which keep strengthens the negative atmosphere of the poem. Moreover, the poet delivers the image of the world that he is experiencing or expecting to come through the division between the two stanzas. The poem describes the contemporary world in the first stanza, and the second stanza describes the future world.In the first stanza, Yeats uses negative dictions frequently to convey that the contemporary world is in state of desolation. For now, in the contpoet to exert greater force in the image itself that he is trying to convey through the specific symbol. Only providing the symbol such as ‘falcon’, not ‘a human is a falcon which cannot hear the falconer’, the reader can focus on the image itself of the what ‘falcon’ delivers. In The line 'Things fall apart; the center cannot hold’ (3) shows that without the direction by the absolute, the world is mere spinning in confusion. As the line goes by, the speaker's negative perception of reality becomes stronger. In ‘Mere anarchy is stored up on the world,’ (4) a speaker's perception of contemporary world is likened to anarchy. The diction of the ‘anarchy’ delivers that not only do human lose their focus, but they also lose order for human life or society. In addition, the critical point to consider in order to understand the poem is the year it was written. ‘The Second Coming’ was written in 1919, shortly after the end of The World War I. The World War I was an devastating event that resul ‘The best lack all conviction, while the worst / are full of passionate intensity’ (7-8), the best faithful people lose their faith and miscreant people who are lack of faith continue their vigorous activities intensively. Naturally, their continuing activities will only stir up the chaos in the world. As such, all lines, except the first line in the first stanza, are made up of negative descriptions. The negative dictions make up a noir atmosphere to effectively deliver the idea that the contemporary world that the speaker is experiencing is a despair itself.However, the future of ‘The Second Coming’ looks hopeless either by the symbolisms and alliterations as well as negative dictions. In the line ‘Surly some release is at hand / Surly the Second Coming is at hand,’ (9-10) the speaker suggests that The Second Coming is certainly coming. Nevertheless, the speaker never offers a hopeful look at ‘The Second Coming’. The Second Coming comes 'When a vast image out of Spiritus Mundi / Tro focusing on the line 'And what rough beast, its own round at last, / Slouches towards Bethlehem,' (21-22) in the point that the beast which comes with ‘The Second Coming’ is intending to be born in the Bethlehem, the beast might symbolize ‘The Second Coming’ itself. The beast clearly associates an image of the monster Sphinx, a symbol of the absolute authority and power. But I can reasonably guess that the future will also be another oppression and chaos, given that ‘The Second Coming’ that came at the end of the contemporary chaos is not a symbol of peace or harmony but a symbol of power. This concept is supported clearly by presenting a dark future from the line 'The Darkness Drop Again.'(18) Furthermore, the poetry delivers alliteration between the lines ‘Surly the Second Coming is at hand’(10) and ‘'The Darkness Drop Again.'(18) Those two lines provide alliteration of ‘s’ and ‘d’. And this is the only figure of an alliteration, which marks in the side slot to the meaning. By deliv Unfortunately, as the beast is willing to be born in this place of sanctity, the sanctity is already suffering a dangerous state. In other words, sanctity has lost its authority. ‘The Second Coming’ encourages contemporary people expect the return of Jesus at first sight, but the reality to come is another beast of power.At last, Yeats tells that the contemporary world is already devastated, but the future with ‘The Second Coming’ is also a chaos threatened by the beast of power. Moreover, what is worse, this chaos will be repeated over and over again. As the first line 'Turning and Turning in the Widening Gyre'(1) suggests, the world revolves. ‘Gyre’ is Yeats's term for a cycle of history. And as the line 'That twenty centuries of stony sleep / Were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle' (19-20) shows, reality is a nightmare occurred by a rocking cradle. But what happens if you wake up from the nightmare? Will the bright future of the world be waiting for you to wake up from your ni

인문/어학| 2020.04.26| 5페이지| 1,500원| 조회(86)

영문학, yeats, The Second Coming, MLA, 에이츠, 영문학 ..

미리보기

닫기
Barbie Q - A Story about Ego-Suppressed Children to Bring a Critical Mind

******Professor ***ENG ****-**8 October 2019A Story about Ego-Suppressed Children to Bring a Critical MindBarbie-Q is a short feminist story written by Sandra Cisneros. In the story, two children are playing with their Barbie dolls. They go to a burnt big toy warehouse which is selling its dolls for a cheap price. One character chose a doll and says “So when our new Barbies smell like smoke, . . . if you dress the Barbie in her new nice-looking fashion, who’s to know.”Some people may insist that this is just a short story about two girls playing with their Barbie doll. For their point of view, as a story about daily life, Barbie-Q is not a feminist story. However, according to a renowned feminist author Bell Hooks, feminism is a movement to bring sexism and exploitation and suppression based on the sexism to an end. Regarding the definition, we can see that the Barbie-Q is a feminist story by its own text for several reasons. First, we should think about the background reason why the crefers to the doll’s ‘career item.’ The pretty Barbie doll never carries professional kinds of stuff showing the doll’s career or personality traits such as a briefcase or a book. Moreover, the doll’s fashion, such as hairstyles or clothes, are made by the older generation, not by the children themselves who actually play with the doll. Finally, by giving the children a sole fixed figure of aesthetic sense, the children are deprived of their chance to agonize which sense they would like to pursue and which figure they would like to be in the future by themselves. The “Barbie-Q” brings up a feminist problem by showing the two character whose independent self-realization is suppressed.Doll playing itself means something more than just a children’s play. Doll playing is the main subject of the story. Doll playing might be seen as a play of young children, but we can find its deeper meaning by how the author’s attitude of showing how the children play it. In the story, the children focus ontion to the inner value.When it comes to the subject of the doll playing, Barbie doll only delivers the ideal image. Barbie shows unrealistic -even impossible- figure of the human body. The unrealistic body becomes ideal for children, which they would never approach because Barbie’s body is not a possible type of human body. Although every person and their bodies are valuable just the way they are, this image of Barbie may deliver undesirable values. Moreover, Barbie never wears pants for its outdoor look. In the story, Barbie always wears a skirt for her outdoor look. This may affect children creating a gender stereotype such as woman is a gender wearing a skirt. When the children who played with Barbie are asked to draw a woman, there is high probability of them drawing a woman with a skirt and heels. Moreover, regardless of the job of the doll, Barbie only delivers the external beauty of woman. In the story, children focus on dressing their career woman Barbie in formal clothes. Evor does not give attention to the other vendor’s stand and stuffs such as “boxed pies, bright orange toilet brushes, rubber gloves, and wrench sets.” The children only focus blindly on Barbie dolls. This shows how a Barbie doll affects children to form narrow-minded preferences. The children unintentionally create values such as beauty is the most valuable factor or how fancy something appears defines how valuable the thing is. From the sentence “If you dress your new scorched Barbie in a dress who’s to know?”, we can see that the children concentrate on the outer part and no place for the inner value. Thereby, the Barbie doll delivers its own value- which only lights a specific image of woman’s beauty. Being undoubtingly and repeatedly exposed to the Barbie doll, children are oppressed to set their own value by practicing Barbie’s ideal. They get to absorb the Barbie’s outer focused value naturally, while the children don’t realize that they lost the chance to form their own preferencwho lost their chance to become truly independent themselves, the author is giving chance to the readers to consider and action about the feminist issues-to bring sexism and exploitation and suppression based on sexism to an end- with our own subjectivity. However, there was one unresolved question remains. How about the children’s attitude about the male doll? More studies can be done about the boy doll, Ken. The sentence “Only Ken’s invisible, right? Because we don’t have money for a stupid-looking boy doll when we’d rather ask for a new Barbie outfit next Christmas.” seems to have significant meaning. From the point of view that the author Sandra Cisneros is telling a feminism story, the expression “we don’t have money for a stupid-looking boy doll” can be interpreted as an idea that feminism is related to both male and female. From the expression, we can find that victim of the sexism and fixed aesthetic sense is not limited to women. Feminism movement, which works to bring sexism AT2

인문/어학| 2020.04.26| 5페이지| 1,500원| 조회(131)

영문학, 에세이, 바비큐, MLA, barbie-q, Sandra Cisneros, 영문학작문

미리보기

닫기
Emily Dickinson’s “Anticlimactic” Perspective About Death

(Name)Professor 000ENG ****-**12 December 2019Emily Dickinson’s “Anticlimactic” Perspective About Death: from a Reasonable Suspicion about Conventional Concept of SalvationEmily Dickinson, a brilliant woman from a small conventional village, is a renowned poet who ceaselessly agonized about the world around her. Her works remarkably contains a unique perspective about death. According to “A Biographical Study of Emily Dickinson’s Preoccupation with Death” by V. Vasanthi, Dickinson was born in Amherst, a small Calvinism town in Massachusetts, and “was forced to accept the Puritan beliefs.” However, although Dickinson was influenced by the conventional faith that people have chance of resurrection after their death, Dickinson shows skeptical perspective about the conventional faith and kept doubting about the existence of the resurrection. Her poem reflects her thought about death.Especially, along with V. Vasanthi’s reference that “Emily Dickinson was preoccupied with death as a consequomb” in “ceremonious” mood (emphasis added). The reason why the speaker accepts the moment of death in ceremonious attitude is because he/she perceivers the death as a start of the “Resurrection.” This delight attitude of the speaker is more remarkable in the third line. In a delightful tone, the speaker questions “was is He, that bore, / And Yesterday, or Centuries before?” With the delightful tone, the speaker is rather shouting with delight of facing the moment of “Resurrection” that God (expressed as “He” in the poetry) experienced “Yesterday, or centuries Before-.” In front of the moment of death, the speaker seems not scared, but rather expectant. In the stanza starting with the line “The Feet, mechanical, go round-,” Dickinson provides a biological process of death that the “The Feet, mechanical, go round-” and a spiritual process of death which is described as “A Quarts contentment, like a stone-” side by side. A “Quartz” is a greatly hard gemstone. The line as “A Quartz conten after the moment of the death. That is, she must have presented a scene of delightful “Resurrection” right after the line “the letting go.” But, she didn’t. Rather, she delivers a critical sight to the readers by the “-,” delivering a lingering imagery to emphasize the moment right after the death, where nothing happens for the faithful speaker.Dickinson’s doubt about the “Resurrection” more remarkably appears in her poetry “My life had stood-a Loaded Gun-” the speaker, explains itself as a “Loaded Gun. “My Master” in this poetry has close relationship with “I.” The line “Deep Pillow- to have shared” and the frequent use of the word “We” , such as the line “We roam in Sovereign Woods-“ and “We hunt the Doe-“, show that the speaker and speaker’s master have a close relationship each other. However, when it comes to their relationship, it does not appear equivalent. As the word “Master” implies, their relationship is quite vertical. The speaker was “identified” by the owner, and “carriement of the death itself. The blinded believers face the death, thus “Untouched by Morning / And untouched by Noon” because they have no tomorrow in their life. As the diction “meek members” in the poem symbolizes, their lives face their ending-moment in a very submissive posture toward the God, expecting for the “Resurrection” (emphasis added). They are depicted as “Rafter of stain,” and “Roof of stone.” Blinded by their longing or expectation for the “Resurrection,” they could not live their own life truly for themselves. Therefore, over faith toward the “Resurrection” was a stain for each of their life. Blinded faith was also useless as a “Roof of stone”, blocking their self-actualization. In contrary, the second stanza of “Safe in their Alabaster Chambers-” portrays an image of indifferent nature. Although the most faithful-even “meek”-members face their final moment, the nature seems uninterested. The “Light laughs the breeze.” The death of the “meek members” has mere tidy, even leir independent values, not based on explicit expectation about “Resurrection.”As a poet who was “forced to accept the Puritan beliefs,” (Vasanthi 8) Dickinson did not meekly follow the conventional faith that there is a “Resurrection” after the death of the faithful believer. Instead, she kept thinking about the existence of the “Resurrection.” Through her works, she delivers the reasonable suspicion about the “Resurrection” after the death, danger of the blinded faith, and the nihility of the blinded belief of “Resurrection” to the world outside of her small conventional village. To borrow the word from Shin, “Dickinson shows a way of confronting the unknown; her honest and courageous quest is all human beings can do” (Shin 4). At last, by suggesting the nihility of the death and the “Resurrection,” Dickinson provides a chance for her readers to contemplate their life and faith, to experience a hearty religion. By recognizing the nihility of the death, Dickinson allowed her contempor1

인문/어학| 2020.04.26| 8페이지| 2,000원| 조회(135)

영문학, Emily Dickinson, 에밀리 디킨슨, 리서치페이퍼, MLA, R..

미리보기

닫기