호프스테드의 4가지(5가지) 문화 이론에 대한 건설적인 비판. -과연 문화에 대한 개념을 4가지,혹은 5가지 이론으로 설명할 수 있는가?-

소개

호프스테드가 주장한 4가지-후에는 5가지-이론이 문화에 대한 우리의 인식을 단순화시켰는가의 여부에 대한 글입니다. 어설프게 베껴서 쓴 글과는 비교가 안될 정도로 reference가 잘 정리되어있어 reference를 중시하는 분께서는 후회하지 않으실 겁니다.

호프스테드 이론의 막대한 영향력을 인정하되 그가 간과한 것들에 대해 다뤘습니다. 영향력이 큰 만큼 비판하는 이론도 많았음이 당연하겠지요?

목차

없음

본문내용

Simplifying culture to overly four or five dimensions, limiting the sample to a single multinational corporation, ignoring other factors except national culture values, dividing culture to bipolar sides, and using concept based on western bias are regarded as the most well known criticism (Nakata & Sivakumar 2001). However, In spite of the criticisms, researchers have favored his framework and made it the dominant culture paradigm (Gibson, Kirkman, & Lowe, 2006). According to Jaeger who quoted Triandis(1982), “Although it has some limitations, most likely it will ‘stand as one of the major land-marks of cross-cultural research for many years to come”(Jaeger, 1986). The problem is, unfortunately, the more use of Hofstede’s work encourage the simpler peoples’ perception of culture.

참고자료

· References
· Archer, M. S. 1989, Culture & agency: the place of culture in social theory, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press,.
· Berry, John W. 1980, Introduction to Methodology. Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Harry Triandis, (ed.) Vol.2, 1-23.
· Bock, Philip. K. 1999, Rethinking psychological anthropology (2nd ed.) Prospects Heights, IL,Waveland.
· Chandy, P.R. & Thomas G.E. Williams. 1994. The Impact of Journals and Authorson International Business Research: A Citational Analysis of JIBS Articles. Journal of International Business Studies, 25 (4): 715-728.
· Gibson, Cristina B., Kirkman, Bradley L. & Lowe, Kevin B. 2006, A quarter century of Culture`s Consequences: A review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede`s cultural values framework, Journal of International Business Studies, Expanded Academic ASAP, Thomson Gale, Griffith University Library, 21 May. 2007
· <http://find.galegroup.com/itx/infomark.do?&contentSet=IAC Documents&type=retrieve&tabID=T002&prodId=EAIM&docId=A147346760&source=gale&srcprod=E AIM&userGroupName=griffith&version=1.0>.
· Goodstein, L. D. 1981, Commentary: Do American theories apply abroad? Organizational Dynamics, Summer, 49-54.
· Hall, Edward. 1976, Beyond Culture. Garden City: NY: Anchor Press/ Doubleday.
· Hofstede, G. 1980, Culture`s consequences: international differences in work-related values, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
· Hofstede, G. 1981, Do American theories apply abroad? A reply to Goodstein and Hunt Organizational Dynamics, 1981, Summer, 63-68.
· Jaeger, Alfred M. 1986, Organization development and national culture: Where’s the fit?, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 11, No.1, 178-199.
· Lytle, A. L., Brett, J. M., Barsness, Z. I., Tinsley, C. H. & Janssens, M. A. 1995, Paradigm for confirmatory cross-cultural research in organizational behaviour, Research in Organizational Behaviour, 167-214.
· McSweeney, Brendan. 2002, Hofstede`s model of national cultural differences and their consequences: A triumph of faith - a failure of analysis, Human Relations, Vol. 55, No. 1, 89-118.
· Magala, Slawomir J. 2004, Cross-cultural compromises, multiculturalism and the actuality of unzipped Hofstede, Erim report series research in management, 21pages.
· https://ep.eur.nl/bitstream/1765/1584/2/ERS+2004+078+ORG.pdf.
· Mead, M. 1962, National character in S. Tax (Ed.) Anthropology today, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
· Nasif, Ercan G., Hamad Al-Daea, Bahman Berahimi,& Mary S. Thibodeaux. 1991. Methodological Problems in Cross-Cultural Research: An Updated Review. Management International Review, 31 (First Quarter): 79-91.
· Nakata, Cheryl & K, Sivakumar. 2001, The Stampede toward Hofstede`s Framework: Avoiding the Sample Design Pit in Cross-Cultural Research, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 32, No. 3. 555-574.
· http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0047- 2506%28200133%2932%3A3%3C555%3ATSTHFA%3E2.0.CO%3B2-Q
· Roberts, A. 1995, The very idea of classification in international accounting, Accounting, Organizations & Society, 20, 7/8, 639-664.
· Triandis, H. C. 1994, Theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of collectivism and individualism, in U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S-C. Choi, and G. Yoon (Eds.) 41-51.
· Whitley, R. 1992, The social construction of organizations and markets: the comparative analysis of business recipes, in M. Reed and M. Hughes (Eds.) Rethinking Organization.