창의 인성교육의 현장 실천도 및 효과성에 관한 교사들의 인식 분석 (A Study on Analysis of Teachers’ Recognition on Field Practice and Effectiveness of Creativity and Character Education)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국수산해양교육학회
· 수록지 정보 : 수산해양교육연구 / 26권 / 5호 / 1096 ~ 1107페이지
· 저자명 : 원효헌, 박소영, 임성민, 오정숙, 박종운, 강버들

초록

The purpose of this study was to investigate teachers‘ recognition on field practice and effectiveness ofcreativity and character education. This study used post tests to examine the effects of teacher training forcreativity and character education on 451 teachers. The results were as follows. Firstly, the average insatisfaction of teacher training for creativity and character education was 4.65 for elementary teachers and4.35 for secondary teachers in summer, and 4.55 for elementary teachers and 4.42 for secondary teachersin winter. Secondly, effectiveness of teacher training on creativity and character education was showedhighly as more than 4.0 and was higher in winter than in summer. Thirdly, in the case of field practiceand effectiveness of teacher training for creativity and character education, the average of elementaryteachers(3,66) was higher in respect of educational environment than that of secondary teachers(3.20) andthe averages of elementary teachers and secondary teachers were 3.85 and 3.42 in respect of subjectactivity, respectively. In practising creativity and character education, it was analyzed that bothelementary(ave. 3.89) and secondary(ave. 3.84) teachers went through some difficulties for curriculumreconstruction, development of instructional model, program development, and human and physical supports.

영어초록

The purpose of this study was to investigate teachers‘ recognition on field practice and effectiveness ofcreativity and character education. This study used post tests to examine the effects of teacher training forcreativity and character education on 451 teachers. The results were as follows. Firstly, the average insatisfaction of teacher training for creativity and character education was 4.65 for elementary teachers and4.35 for secondary teachers in summer, and 4.55 for elementary teachers and 4.42 for secondary teachersin winter. Secondly, effectiveness of teacher training on creativity and character education was showedhighly as more than 4.0 and was higher in winter than in summer. Thirdly, in the case of field practiceand effectiveness of teacher training for creativity and character education, the average of elementaryteachers(3,66) was higher in respect of educational environment than that of secondary teachers(3.20) andthe averages of elementary teachers and secondary teachers were 3.85 and 3.42 in respect of subjectactivity, respectively. In practising creativity and character education, it was analyzed that bothelementary(ave. 3.89) and secondary(ave. 3.84) teachers went through some difficulties for curriculumreconstruction, development of instructional model, program development, and human and physical supports.

참고자료

· 없음