PARTNER
검증된 파트너 제휴사 자료

Gewährleistungsstaat und Regulierungsreform in Deutschland: From deregulation to smart regulation

한국학술지에서 제공하는 국내 최고 수준의 학술 데이터베이스를 통해 다양한 논문과 학술지 정보를 만나보세요.
44 페이지
기타파일
최초등록일 2025.06.21 최종저작일 2015.06
44P 미리보기
Gewährleistungsstaat und Regulierungsreform in Deutschland: From deregulation to smart regulation
  • 미리보기

    서지정보

    · 발행기관 : 이화여자대학교 법학연구소
    · 수록지 정보 : 법학논집 / 19권 / 4호 / 81 ~ 124페이지
    · 저자명 : JanZiekow

    초록

    The idea that there are too many regulations excessively restricting the economic freedom of enterprises and citizens is widespread in Germany. Yet empirical evidence supporting this perception does not exist, even from a relative perspective as compared to other countries.
    Ⅰ. The guarantor state's comprehension of regulation In Germany, as in many states, there have been intensive debates about the changing role of the government over the last 20 years. The concept of the guarantor state is based on the insight that the state does not have a monopoly on the right to formulate and implement policies on public interest issues but rather that this requires the cooperation of government and private actors. The major objective therein is the sound division of roles for the successful fulfillment of public tasks. The guarantor state’s role is thus to choose the mode of regulation that best enables the public interest to be realized as effectively and efficiently as possible while at the same time minimizing the direct and indirect burdens that arise from the regulation. It is assumed that these objectives can best be achieved through the adoption and use of a model of cooperative regulation.
    The linking function of the model of regulated self-regulation consists of the combination of private and government rationalities in order to achieve an overarching objective, in which the government will take over the responsibility for delivery and designs its role accordingly.
    Ⅱ. The development of regulatory reform in Germany and the guarantor state The development of the regulatory reform agenda in Germany is characterized by several approaches, which should not be understood as alternatives but which complements capable of enhancing each other.
    Deregulation: In both the federation (the German state as a whole) as well as in the federal states (the Länder) numerous regulations with too prescriptive impact on economic development have been nullified following the reports of deregulation commissions. In addition, regular legal adjustments are made to purge obsolete or redundant regulations. In this way, between the years 2003 and 2009 more than 1,000 laws and acts were done away with.
    Regulated self-regulation: Due to the need to secure the public interest, many regulations cannot be waived without providing an alternative. In these cases, the model of self-regulation can be implemented, by which solutions to public interest issues are provided by private standards and market-based approaches to decision-making in line with the public good. Consequently, the responsibility for delivery remains with the government, which shall interfere actively in all cases where entrepreneurial self-regulation methods do not function adequately.
    Quality of regulation: The importance that the regulatory mode of regulated self-regulation has gained in the regulatory reform agenda makes clear that the critical issue is not only whether a regulation is necessary or can be omitted or waived, but rather the quality of a regulation. Addressing quality issues requires a complex mix of instruments, of which the essential elements are legal impact assessments, especially of bureaucratic and compliance costs, sunset-legislation clauses, evaluation, and experimentation clauses.
    Ⅲ. Structures and the future of the regulatory reform in Germany Summarizing regulatory reform in Germany over the last 25 years, it can be said that regulatory reform is not a single act but a complex system, one which is subject to continuous development and in a permanent state of implementation. This system consists of quantitative and qualitative elements, which correspond closely to the concept for European law that the European commission calls “Smart Regulation.” Based on this, in 2014 the German federal government passed two resolutions that laid down the agenda for regulatory reform in the coming years. The approach of this new program focuses primarily on the quality of the regulations in order to minimize the resulting burdens for companies and citizens.

    참고자료

    · 없음
  • 자주묻는질문의 답변을 확인해 주세요

    해피캠퍼스 FAQ 더보기

    꼭 알아주세요

    • 자료의 정보 및 내용의 진실성에 대하여 해피캠퍼스는 보증하지 않으며, 해당 정보 및 게시물 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다.
      자료 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용, 무단 전재∙배포는 금지되어 있습니다.
      저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁 요소 발견 시 고객센터의 저작권침해 신고센터를 이용해 주시기 바랍니다.
    • 해피캠퍼스는 구매자와 판매자 모두가 만족하는 서비스가 되도록 노력하고 있으며, 아래의 4가지 자료환불 조건을 꼭 확인해주시기 바랍니다.
      파일오류 중복자료 저작권 없음 설명과 실제 내용 불일치
      파일의 다운로드가 제대로 되지 않거나 파일형식에 맞는 프로그램으로 정상 작동하지 않는 경우 다른 자료와 70% 이상 내용이 일치하는 경우 (중복임을 확인할 수 있는 근거 필요함) 인터넷의 다른 사이트, 연구기관, 학교, 서적 등의 자료를 도용한 경우 자료의 설명과 실제 자료의 내용이 일치하지 않는 경우

“법학논집”의 다른 논문도 확인해 보세요!

문서 초안을 생성해주는 EasyAI
안녕하세요. 해피캠퍼스의 방대한 자료 중에서 선별하여 당신만의 초안을 만들어주는 EasyAI 입니다.
저는 아래와 같이 작업을 도와드립니다.
- 주제만 입력하면 목차부터 본문내용까지 자동 생성해 드립니다.
- 장문의 콘텐츠를 쉽고 빠르게 작성해 드립니다.
- 스토어에서 무료 캐시를 계정별로 1회 발급 받을 수 있습니다. 지금 바로 체험해 보세요!
이런 주제들을 입력해 보세요.
- 유아에게 적합한 문학작품의 기준과 특성
- 한국인의 가치관 중에서 정신적 가치관을 이루는 것들을 문화적 문법으로 정리하고, 현대한국사회에서 일어나는 사건과 사고를 비교하여 자신의 의견으로 기술하세요
- 작별인사 독후감
해캠 AI 챗봇과 대화하기
챗봇으로 간편하게 상담해보세요.
2025년 08월 14일 목요일
AI 챗봇
안녕하세요. 해피캠퍼스 AI 챗봇입니다. 무엇이 궁금하신가요?
6:07 오전