金庾信 說話의 敍事와 三韓一統意識 (The Narrative and the Notion of “Three Han units being one” of Kim Yu Shin's tales)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 진단학회
· 수록지 정보 : 진단학보 / 140호 / 29 ~ 61페이지
· 저자명 : 윤경진

초록

이 연구는 『삼국사기』와 『삼국유사』 등에 실린 김유신 설화를 삼한일통의식과 관련하여 분석한 것이다.
김유신은 백제 공멸 이후에는 연로하여 전쟁에서 별다른 역할을 하지 못했음에도 고구려 멸망과 관련된 설화가 여럿 보인다. 이것은 그의 역할을 兩國平定으로 제시하여 무열왕과 문무왕의 공업을 대체하기 위한 것이다.
김유신은 羅唐戰爭에서도 중요한 역할을 한 것으로 나오는데, 당군 독살설이 대표적이다. 이는 신라와 당을 적대적 관계로 제시함으로써 백제와 고구려를 신라와 같은 편으로 인식할 수 있게 하였다. 김유신은 죽은 뒤에도 신라를 지키는 護國神으로 간주되면서 체제 안정을 표상하였다.
이러한 설화들은 김유신을 현창하기 위해 후대에 가공한 것이기 때문에 7세기 삼한일통의식을 설정하는 근거가 될 수 없다. 다만 당시 전쟁을 兩國平定에서 一統三國으로 새롭게 인식하는 토대가 됨으로써 9세기 삼한일통의식이 출현하는 단서를 제공한 것으로 평가된다.

영어초록

Examined in this article are the tales of Kim Yu-shin recorded in Samguk Sagi and Samguk Yusa, in terms of its relationship with the “Three Hans were One” notion.
After Baekje fell, Kim Yu-shin, at his old age, could not play much of a role in the war that continued, but nevertheless there are indeed several remaining tales of him related to the fall of Goguryeo. These stories seem to have intended the showcasing of his accomplishments in conquering both countries(“兩國平定”), and elevate him to the level of kings Mu’yeol-wang & Munmu-wang, or even have Kim Yu-shin replace them as the ultimate conquerer.
According to these stories, Kim Yu-shin also played an important role in the Shilla-Dang war. The story of the ‘Dang trooper assassination plot by poison’ is the most glaring example. The narrative places Shilla and Dang in an adversarial dynamic, so that the reader would consider Baekje and Goguryeo to be on the same side with Shilla. Kim Yu-shin was also considered as a state protecting deity(護國神), trying to guard the country even after his death, and became a symbol of state stability.
All these stories were fabricated in the following years to commemorate Kim Yu-shin, so they cannot serve as a basis for a theory arguing the presence of the “Three Hans were One” notion in the 7th century. However, these stories seem to have indeed laid down the ground work for people to shift their view on the war: from seeing it as a mere conquest of two countries, then later regarding it as the unification of the Three Hans(“一統三國”). It seems like it did serve as a foundation upon which the aforementioned notion to form and appear in the 9th century.

참고자료

· 없음