위진 繪畵觀의 형성과 士人의 인생태도 (A Formation of Wei-Jin Perspective in Painting and the Shiren(士人)’s Posture of Life)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국중국학회
· 수록지 정보 : 중국학보 / 58호 / 445 ~ 463페이지
· 저자명 : 김백균

초록

Nowadays what we called the art are based on aesthetical experience. When we go through aesthetic experience by certain form, we call it art. However, between these activities of art and conceptual recognition of comprehending Being-art is different. For example, we can think that ancient painting at Grotte de Lascaux might be a fine art work. But people who created or see the works might not consider their activities as art creation or appreciation. These days the reason why we take Grotte de Lascaux as fine master piece is that we seeing these with the art conception which is already backgrounded. Strictly speaking, we are recognizing and enjoying art with special point of view that made at western Modern age. In the West, the conception of art is peculiarity idea arised at 17century, the East had very similar point of view with Modern art was formed during 3,4 century ending of Han dynasty and chaotic Wei-Jin era. Although there wasn't any appearance of specific word of 'art' like these days'. Expanding established meanings of linguistic media, over restricted expression new recognitional method was presented for abundant transmission of meanings as the world called 'art'. Passing over existing cognitive forms of painting, literature, and music, it developed to new dimensional recognition. These awareness intimately reflected and appear at Qiyun(氣韻) theory argued by Xie-He(謝赫) at ≪Guhuapinlu(古畵品錄)≫ or Liu-Xie(劉勰)'s <Yinxiu(隱秀)> of ≪Wenxindiaolong(文心雕龍)≫, Zhong-Rong(鐘嶸)'s ≪Shipin(詩品)≫ and so on.
There are no other different view that in the Asian society Wei-Jin period was one kind of self awakening time to the Art. But it seems to be need that the reason why this was happened in that time has to be examined more. The research that studied about this problem mainly set value on explaining the relation of awakeness of Art and Wei-Jin metaphysics(魏晉玄學) that was dominant idea in that time. But Art is not a subject that merely use philosophical tendency to interpret. Art is on the practical realm and is to be aware with the body and a sensation. For explaining the influence by one certain philosophic principle, it has too many variables to affect.
Therefore this paper intend to find forming a Wei-Jin perspective of painting, represented for Qiyun(氣韻) theory, not by the direct comparison with Wei-Jin metaphysics(魏晉玄學), but by considering the discovery which clue is the Wei-Jin intelligentsia's posture of life to the world. Even though posture of life is a phenomenon that comes from a view of the world and it seems like acted by relation of entity and its operation, now days if we admit the limit that the feature of intrinsic nature can not be drawn by logical linguistic description of a world view, we can have the oughtness to suggest and explain true nature by this. Consequently this article regards the intelligentsia's posture of life at that time as a kind of criterion for comprehending their view of the world. As we can not interpret our life in one logical frame, because it is difficult to explain one man's view of world in one perspective.

영어초록

Nowadays what we called the art are based on aesthetical experience. When we go through aesthetic experience by certain form, we call it art. However, between these activities of art and conceptual recognition of comprehending Being-art is different. For example, we can think that ancient painting at Grotte de Lascaux might be a fine art work. But people who created or see the works might not consider their activities as art creation or appreciation. These days the reason why we take Grotte de Lascaux as fine master piece is that we seeing these with the art conception which is already backgrounded. Strictly speaking, we are recognizing and enjoying art with special point of view that made at western Modern age. In the West, the conception of art is peculiarity idea arised at 17century, the East had very similar point of view with Modern art was formed during 3,4 century ending of Han dynasty and chaotic Wei-Jin era. Although there wasn't any appearance of specific word of 'art' like these days'. Expanding established meanings of linguistic media, over restricted expression new recognitional method was presented for abundant transmission of meanings as the world called 'art'. Passing over existing cognitive forms of painting, literature, and music, it developed to new dimensional recognition. These awareness intimately reflected and appear at Qiyun(氣韻) theory argued by Xie-He(謝赫) at ≪Guhuapinlu(古畵品錄)≫ or Liu-Xie(劉勰)'s <Yinxiu(隱秀)> of ≪Wenxindiaolong(文心雕龍)≫, Zhong-Rong(鐘嶸)'s ≪Shipin(詩品)≫ and so on.
There are no other different view that in the Asian society Wei-Jin period was one kind of self awakening time to the Art. But it seems to be need that the reason why this was happened in that time has to be examined more. The research that studied about this problem mainly set value on explaining the relation of awakeness of Art and Wei-Jin metaphysics(魏晉玄學) that was dominant idea in that time. But Art is not a subject that merely use philosophical tendency to interpret. Art is on the practical realm and is to be aware with the body and a sensation. For explaining the influence by one certain philosophic principle, it has too many variables to affect.
Therefore this paper intend to find forming a Wei-Jin perspective of painting, represented for Qiyun(氣韻) theory, not by the direct comparison with Wei-Jin metaphysics(魏晉玄學), but by considering the discovery which clue is the Wei-Jin intelligentsia's posture of life to the world. Even though posture of life is a phenomenon that comes from a view of the world and it seems like acted by relation of entity and its operation, now days if we admit the limit that the feature of intrinsic nature can not be drawn by logical linguistic description of a world view, we can have the oughtness to suggest and explain true nature by this. Consequently this article regards the intelligentsia's posture of life at that time as a kind of criterion for comprehending their view of the world. As we can not interpret our life in one logical frame, because it is difficult to explain one man's view of world in one perspective.

참고자료

· 없음