• AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
PARTNER
검증된 파트너 제휴사 자료

공연에 대한 생성 존재론적 해명 - 발생론적 관점에서의 공연 (Becoming-Ontologic interpretation of Performance)

36 페이지
기타파일
최초등록일 2025.04.22 최종저작일 2018.12
36P 미리보기
공연에 대한 생성 존재론적 해명 - 발생론적 관점에서의 공연
  • 미리보기

    서지정보

    · 발행기관 : 한국연극교육학회
    · 수록지 정보 : 연극교육연구 / 33권 / 33호 / 67 ~ 102페이지
    · 저자명 : 김미현

    초록

    A performance is an organism made of action and movement. Performance is presenting the organization ‘body’ which is made of action and movement in front of the anonymous crowd. Deleuze doesn't admit about determining any kind of ‘body’ as a thing that already exists. A performance is a sort of ‘body’. Following Deleuze's becoming-ontology, with the thought that a performance is not a determined body, we can talk about a performance on the perspective of its occurrence. A performance is not a ‘body’ which is already made, it is a ‘body’ that is being made.
    The most important aesthetic concept of Platon's artistic creation model is mimesis or representation. But there is a paradox hiding in Platon's philosophy. The eternal Idea cannot completely dominate ‘сhora’, rather, the ‘сhora’ becomes the winner. The Idea, which is the mould or the frame, presses the ‘substance’ chora to create a work but there is always a surplus out of the frame.
    A performance is primarily made through body relationship but it is also the body which breaks up the show and lead to formation change. Borrowing Deleuze's pleonasm, body(or the relationship of them) is the condition that makes the performance's formation change by continuing ‘difference and repetition’.
    Fischer-Lichte talk about performances as event. Performance is not a ‘work’ nor ‘text’. It is an ‘event’. The primary thing here is the interdependent body coexistence of the participants. In the ‘event’, the determination of significant action keeps on getting delayed. In the performance, the performance itself continues to formation-change by the establishment of unique perceptional arrangements.
    If Fischer-Lichte discusses the performance mainly through an event as a herd effect, material effect and focuses on the boundary conversion of the performance(event), Hans-Thies Lehmann goes further down and focuses on the body level. But Lehmann does not go completely down to the body level, he focuses between the event-surface and the body level-depth.
    Lehmann sees that the most definite thing that differentiates drama and post drama is a ‘matter of arranging elements like constituting constellation’. The elements constituting the performance will not determine a well-made organism nor a purpose and it won't work together like the parts in an exquisite description. Like Deleuze said, the performance will be ‘a body without organ’. The show as a ‘body without organ’, it will be a ‘body’ with cracks and ruptures everywhere.
    The performance(body without organ) can be visually expressed as “the figure”, the drawing of Bacon, which Deleuze strongly focused on. Figure is the sense of power. The figure that is crushed, twisted and bundled up by the intrusion of power. In other words, the performance as the ‘figure’ will be the expose of power. Contemporary performance corresponds to Paul Klee's words: “it is not representation what we see, it is presentation what we can't see”. A performance is a dynamic place with the outside of relationship, in other words, difference itself and time, life, desire, power before it is a representation.

    영어초록

    A performance is an organism made of action and movement. Performance is presenting the organization ‘body’ which is made of action and movement in front of the anonymous crowd. Deleuze doesn't admit about determining any kind of ‘body’ as a thing that already exists. A performance is a sort of ‘body’. Following Deleuze's becoming-ontology, with the thought that a performance is not a determined body, we can talk about a performance on the perspective of its occurrence. A performance is not a ‘body’ which is already made, it is a ‘body’ that is being made.
    The most important aesthetic concept of Platon's artistic creation model is mimesis or representation. But there is a paradox hiding in Platon's philosophy. The eternal Idea cannot completely dominate ‘сhora’, rather, the ‘сhora’ becomes the winner. The Idea, which is the mould or the frame, presses the ‘substance’ chora to create a work but there is always a surplus out of the frame.
    A performance is primarily made through body relationship but it is also the body which breaks up the show and lead to formation change. Borrowing Deleuze's pleonasm, body(or the relationship of them) is the condition that makes the performance's formation change by continuing ‘difference and repetition’.
    Fischer-Lichte talk about performances as event. Performance is not a ‘work’ nor ‘text’. It is an ‘event’. The primary thing here is the interdependent body coexistence of the participants. In the ‘event’, the determination of significant action keeps on getting delayed. In the performance, the performance itself continues to formation-change by the establishment of unique perceptional arrangements.
    If Fischer-Lichte discusses the performance mainly through an event as a herd effect, material effect and focuses on the boundary conversion of the performance(event), Hans-Thies Lehmann goes further down and focuses on the body level. But Lehmann does not go completely down to the body level, he focuses between the event-surface and the body level-depth.
    Lehmann sees that the most definite thing that differentiates drama and post drama is a ‘matter of arranging elements like constituting constellation’. The elements constituting the performance will not determine a well-made organism nor a purpose and it won't work together like the parts in an exquisite description. Like Deleuze said, the performance will be ‘a body without organ’. The show as a ‘body without organ’, it will be a ‘body’ with cracks and ruptures everywhere.
    The performance(body without organ) can be visually expressed as “the figure”, the drawing of Bacon, which Deleuze strongly focused on. Figure is the sense of power. The figure that is crushed, twisted and bundled up by the intrusion of power. In other words, the performance as the ‘figure’ will be the expose of power. Contemporary performance corresponds to Paul Klee's words: “it is not representation what we see, it is presentation what we can't see”. A performance is a dynamic place with the outside of relationship, in other words, difference itself and time, life, desire, power before it is a representation.

    참고자료

    · 없음
  • 자주묻는질문의 답변을 확인해 주세요

    해피캠퍼스 FAQ 더보기

    꼭 알아주세요

    • 자료의 정보 및 내용의 진실성에 대하여 해피캠퍼스는 보증하지 않으며, 해당 정보 및 게시물 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다.
      자료 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용, 무단 전재∙배포는 금지되어 있습니다.
      저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁 요소 발견 시 고객센터의 저작권침해 신고센터를 이용해 주시기 바랍니다.
    • 해피캠퍼스는 구매자와 판매자 모두가 만족하는 서비스가 되도록 노력하고 있으며, 아래의 4가지 자료환불 조건을 꼭 확인해주시기 바랍니다.
      파일오류 중복자료 저작권 없음 설명과 실제 내용 불일치
      파일의 다운로드가 제대로 되지 않거나 파일형식에 맞는 프로그램으로 정상 작동하지 않는 경우 다른 자료와 70% 이상 내용이 일치하는 경우 (중복임을 확인할 수 있는 근거 필요함) 인터넷의 다른 사이트, 연구기관, 학교, 서적 등의 자료를 도용한 경우 자료의 설명과 실제 자료의 내용이 일치하지 않는 경우
문서 초안을 생성해주는 EasyAI
안녕하세요 해피캠퍼스의 20년의 운영 노하우를 이용하여 당신만의 초안을 만들어주는 EasyAI 입니다.
저는 아래와 같이 작업을 도와드립니다.
- 주제만 입력하면 AI가 방대한 정보를 재가공하여, 최적의 목차와 내용을 자동으로 만들어 드립니다.
- 장문의 콘텐츠를 쉽고 빠르게 작성해 드립니다.
- 스토어에서 무료 이용권를 계정별로 1회 발급 받을 수 있습니다. 지금 바로 체험해 보세요!
이런 주제들을 입력해 보세요.
- 유아에게 적합한 문학작품의 기준과 특성
- 한국인의 가치관 중에서 정신적 가치관을 이루는 것들을 문화적 문법으로 정리하고, 현대한국사회에서 일어나는 사건과 사고를 비교하여 자신의 의견으로 기술하세요
- 작별인사 독후감
해캠 AI 챗봇과 대화하기
챗봇으로 간편하게 상담해보세요.
2026년 01월 10일 토요일
AI 챗봇
안녕하세요. 해피캠퍼스 AI 챗봇입니다. 무엇이 궁금하신가요?
2:53 오후