문화공간에서 공간문화로의 함의 (The Implication for Transition from Cultural Space to Spatial Culture)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국문화공간건축학회
· 수록지 정보 : 한국문화공간건축학회논문집 / 28호 / 49 ~ 58페이지
· 저자명 : 윤일

초록

Since the Industrial Revolution, policy directions have been developed according to the economic criteria that the focus was on economic development rather than interest in culture. Thus, culture has been neglected from the development standards. Up to now, culture has developed quantitatively rather than qualitatively, limiting it to space centered on facilities. In order for ordinary people to experience culture, they had to find and visit for themselves places where cultural facilities were established, regardless of the distance. However, as the basic needs were fulfilled with economic development, people’s interest in happiness, as well as social and politic interest, has been augmented. Happiness economists state that such phenomenon arouses Easterlin paradox which is a phenomenon that when GNP is more than US$10,000, the effect of increase in happiness due to the economy diminishes even when economic desire is fulfilled. This implies that materialism that follows economic development presents limits to happiness of people, and that economic matters cannot be the basis for happiness. Thus, this research presents the existing limitconomiin the present cultural space in enhancing happiness according to periodic circumstances, and seeks to ind ecoe the direction for “sness. Tculture, and not cultural space” since the new social development index calls for a cultural criteria rather than economic. Hence, spass. Tculture can be defined as a space where cultural actions can be actively carried out through nearby surrounding environment; space where cultures can be obtained through accessible space; and space where culture finds the public to realize communication between space and space · space and culture · human and culture through participation and experience. Moreover, this study has its purpose in analyzing the need for spatial culture, and doing a comparative analysis on the interpretation of concepts of cultural space and spatial culture, in order to provide the direction for spatial culture.

영어초록

Since the Industrial Revolution, policy directions have been developed according to the economic criteria that the focus was on economic development rather than interest in culture. Thus, culture has been neglected from the development standards. Up to now, culture has developed quantitatively rather than qualitatively, limiting it to space centered on facilities. In order for ordinary people to experience culture, they had to find and visit for themselves places where cultural facilities were established, regardless of the distance. However, as the basic needs were fulfilled with economic development, people’s interest in happiness, as well as social and politic interest, has been augmented. Happiness economists state that such phenomenon arouses Easterlin paradox which is a phenomenon that when GNP is more than US$10,000, the effect of increase in happiness due to the economy diminishes even when economic desire is fulfilled. This implies that materialism that follows economic development presents limits to happiness of people, and that economic matters cannot be the basis for happiness. Thus, this research presents the existing limitconomiin the present cultural space in enhancing happiness according to periodic circumstances, and seeks to ind ecoe the direction for “sness. Tculture, and not cultural space” since the new social development index calls for a cultural criteria rather than economic. Hence, spass. Tculture can be defined as a space where cultural actions can be actively carried out through nearby surrounding environment; space where cultures can be obtained through accessible space; and space where culture finds the public to realize communication between space and space · space and culture · human and culture through participation and experience. Moreover, this study has its purpose in analyzing the need for spatial culture, and doing a comparative analysis on the interpretation of concepts of cultural space and spatial culture, in order to provide the direction for spatial culture.

참고자료

· 없음