• AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
  • AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
  • AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
  • AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
PARTNER
검증된 파트너 제휴사 자료

1960년대 정치세력의 통일논의 전개와 성격 (Development and Character of the Unification Discussions among Political Groups in the 1960s)

35 페이지
기타파일
최초등록일 2025.03.28 최종저작일 2013.02
35P 미리보기
1960년대 정치세력의 통일논의 전개와 성격
  • 미리보기

    서지정보

    · 발행기관 : 고려사학회
    · 수록지 정보 : 韓國史學報 / 50호 / 213 ~ 247페이지
    · 저자명 : 이주봉

    초록

    By tracing the changes in the unification theory adopted by the Park Chung-hee government and opposition parties in the 1960s in the aftermath of the May 16th Military Coup of 1961 and connecting the April Resistance of 1960 to the active unification policy of the Park Chung-hee government in the 1970s, this study reveals the characteristics and periodic significance of the unification theory adhered to in the 1960s.
    Based on the principle of unification through victory over communism, the Park Chung-hee government and the conservative opposition parties agreed to focus on economic development first and unification later. They were also of the same mindset with regards to the holding of a general election under the auspices of the UN. However, cracks began to emerge in the unification theory of the conservative parties following the emergence of a new debate over unification created by the Democratic Socialist Party's calls for inter-Korean exchanges during the political reorganization process of 1966 that occurred a year prior to the Presidential and National Assembly elections.


    Increasingly critical of the government's use of the Anti- Communist Law to control the debate over unification, conservative opposition parties began to call for modifications to the holding of a general election under the auspices of the UN and the establishment of limited inter-Korean exchanges. The government partially modified the notion of holding a general election under the auspices of the UN, and increasingly advocated the gradual reunification theory that would become the norm from the late 1970s onwards. However, the debate over unification amongst political groups during this period clearly exposed the limitations of politics in the 1960s, a period in which the true intention was to grasp political power rather than prepare realistic measures for unification.


    This study successfully showed a clear link between the unification theory and discussions on unification among political groups in the 1960s and the April Resistance of 1960. Moreover, it also shed light on the intrinsic causes of the Park Chung-hee government's active unification policy of the 1970s. The Park Chung-hee government's volte-face in terms of its unification policy in the 1970s was spurred by external changes in the political landscape and the advent of the spirit of detente within a South Korean society that supported the calls for inter-Korean exchanges that began in the late 1960s. Furthermore, the tacit agreement within Korean society regarding the existence of two Koreas and the decline of the significance of a general election under the auspices of the UN during the late 1960s eventually paved the way for the Declaration for Peace and Unification on June 23, 1973. This in turn not only concertized the existence of two Koreas, but also facilitated the North and South's simultaneous joining of the UN.

    영어초록

    By tracing the changes in the unification theory adopted by the Park Chung-hee government and opposition parties in the 1960s in the aftermath of the May 16th Military Coup of 1961 and connecting the April Resistance of 1960 to the active unification policy of the Park Chung-hee government in the 1970s, this study reveals the characteristics and periodic significance of the unification theory adhered to in the 1960s.
    Based on the principle of unification through victory over communism, the Park Chung-hee government and the conservative opposition parties agreed to focus on economic development first and unification later. They were also of the same mindset with regards to the holding of a general election under the auspices of the UN. However, cracks began to emerge in the unification theory of the conservative parties following the emergence of a new debate over unification created by the Democratic Socialist Party's calls for inter-Korean exchanges during the political reorganization process of 1966 that occurred a year prior to the Presidential and National Assembly elections.


    Increasingly critical of the government's use of the Anti- Communist Law to control the debate over unification, conservative opposition parties began to call for modifications to the holding of a general election under the auspices of the UN and the establishment of limited inter-Korean exchanges. The government partially modified the notion of holding a general election under the auspices of the UN, and increasingly advocated the gradual reunification theory that would become the norm from the late 1970s onwards. However, the debate over unification amongst political groups during this period clearly exposed the limitations of politics in the 1960s, a period in which the true intention was to grasp political power rather than prepare realistic measures for unification.


    This study successfully showed a clear link between the unification theory and discussions on unification among political groups in the 1960s and the April Resistance of 1960. Moreover, it also shed light on the intrinsic causes of the Park Chung-hee government's active unification policy of the 1970s. The Park Chung-hee government's volte-face in terms of its unification policy in the 1970s was spurred by external changes in the political landscape and the advent of the spirit of detente within a South Korean society that supported the calls for inter-Korean exchanges that began in the late 1960s. Furthermore, the tacit agreement within Korean society regarding the existence of two Koreas and the decline of the significance of a general election under the auspices of the UN during the late 1960s eventually paved the way for the Declaration for Peace and Unification on June 23, 1973. This in turn not only concertized the existence of two Koreas, but also facilitated the North and South's simultaneous joining of the UN.

    참고자료

    · 없음
  • 자주묻는질문의 답변을 확인해 주세요

    해피캠퍼스 FAQ 더보기

    꼭 알아주세요

    • 자료의 정보 및 내용의 진실성에 대하여 해피캠퍼스는 보증하지 않으며, 해당 정보 및 게시물 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다.
      자료 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용, 무단 전재∙배포는 금지되어 있습니다.
      저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁 요소 발견 시 고객센터의 저작권침해 신고센터를 이용해 주시기 바랍니다.
    • 해피캠퍼스는 구매자와 판매자 모두가 만족하는 서비스가 되도록 노력하고 있으며, 아래의 4가지 자료환불 조건을 꼭 확인해주시기 바랍니다.
      파일오류 중복자료 저작권 없음 설명과 실제 내용 불일치
      파일의 다운로드가 제대로 되지 않거나 파일형식에 맞는 프로그램으로 정상 작동하지 않는 경우 다른 자료와 70% 이상 내용이 일치하는 경우 (중복임을 확인할 수 있는 근거 필요함) 인터넷의 다른 사이트, 연구기관, 학교, 서적 등의 자료를 도용한 경우 자료의 설명과 실제 자료의 내용이 일치하지 않는 경우

“韓國史學報”의 다른 논문도 확인해 보세요!

찾으시던 자료가 아닌가요?

지금 보는 자료와 연관되어 있어요!
왼쪽 화살표
오른쪽 화살표
문서 초안을 생성해주는 EasyAI
안녕하세요 해피캠퍼스의 20년의 운영 노하우를 이용하여 당신만의 초안을 만들어주는 EasyAI 입니다.
저는 아래와 같이 작업을 도와드립니다.
- 주제만 입력하면 AI가 방대한 정보를 재가공하여, 최적의 목차와 내용을 자동으로 만들어 드립니다.
- 장문의 콘텐츠를 쉽고 빠르게 작성해 드립니다.
- 스토어에서 무료 이용권를 계정별로 1회 발급 받을 수 있습니다. 지금 바로 체험해 보세요!
이런 주제들을 입력해 보세요.
- 유아에게 적합한 문학작품의 기준과 특성
- 한국인의 가치관 중에서 정신적 가치관을 이루는 것들을 문화적 문법으로 정리하고, 현대한국사회에서 일어나는 사건과 사고를 비교하여 자신의 의견으로 기술하세요
- 작별인사 독후감
해캠 AI 챗봇과 대화하기
챗봇으로 간편하게 상담해보세요.
2025년 09월 03일 수요일
AI 챗봇
안녕하세요. 해피캠퍼스 AI 챗봇입니다. 무엇이 궁금하신가요?
5:07 오후