1950년대의 기록문학운동 -<국민>에서 <대중>으로-

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 단국대학교 동아시아인문융복합연구소
· 수록지 정보 : 日本學硏究 / 27권 / 357 ~ 381페이지
· 저자명 : 오미정

초록

1950年代戦後日本文学は記録文学運動が大きく起きた。戦後文学が<記録>へ走った理由について本稿は考察してみた。
　1、2章では記録文学運動の起源と争点を中心に考察してみた。それによって、当時の記録文学論が 「反米」を通じた「国民」の創出という国民文学的母体から由来しており、それゆえ「国民的」アイデンティティを高揚させようとした時代のアクチュアリティと深く関わっていたことがわかった。3章では「現在の会」時代を中心に生活作文レベルの記録を否定し、ルポルタージュに記録を求めた時期の意味を『国民」の創出という角度から分析した。さらに、戦後アバンギャルドド運動とコミュニズムに関わった作家の安部公房（1924-1993)を中心に、記録文学論の相違なる流れについて考察した。4章では「記録芸術の会」時代を中心にダキュメンタリーに記録を求めた時期の意味を分析し、大衆社会化の進展という局面から「大衆」とマスメディアとの関連を考察してみた。
　結論的に戦後記録文学運動は単なる表現の問題だけではなく、時代的要請に積極的に応じ、連続と断絶の側面があったことを明らかにしてみた。

영어초록

In 1950s, a documentary movement stood up greatly in Postwar Japanese literature. I researched the reason why the postwar literature which was performed in various forms rushed the documentary movement, and inspected mainly on the origin and the issue of the documentary movement through chapter 1 and 2.　The debate on documentary literature was relatied with the debate on national literature which intended to create "the nation" through "Hanbei" or the anti-Americanism. I made clear that the documentary movement was deeply concerned with the actuality in that times.
In Chapter 3, I reserched the two different flow of the documentary movement focused on Abe Kobo. I made sure it on the focus of the period of "Genzai no Kai" that considered the "reportage" as the Record.
In Chapter 4, I reviewed the meaning of that time why the word of "reportage" changed with "documentary" at the next "Kiroku Geijutsu no Kai" period. I considered the connection between documentary and the mass.
Conclusively, postwar documentary movement was not only the issue of expression but also the engagement of politics of the 1950s. Finally, I want to clarified that there were two sides of continuation and break for documentary movement in 1950s.

참고자료

· 없음