기독교의 절대성과 종교사 신학: 트뢸취, 틸리히, 판넨베르크를 중심으로 (The Absoluteness of Christianity and Theology of History of Religions: E. Troeltsch, P. Tillich and W. Pannenberg)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 연세대학교 한국기독교문화연구소
· 수록지 정보 : 신학논단 / 71권 / 67 ~ 97페이지
· 저자명 : 박영식

초록

The aim of this study is to propose a new model for the interreligious relationship by examining thoughts of Christian theologians who criticised the absoluteness of Christianity and explored a theology of history of religions. Ernst Troeltsch criticised the absoluteness of Christianity claimed from the point of view of dogmatism and speculative historical approach. But his criticism of the absoluteness of Christianity is taken from the point of historical approach to religions as religions. Instead of this point of view, his theological successor Tillich tried to reset the relationship of religions by attention to the relationship of revelation and religion. The revelation of Jesus Christ is the critical criterion of all religious experiences and practices including those of Christianity. Pannenberg criticised Troeltsch's viewpoint that neglected the theological point, while he also criticized Tillich's phenomenological approach to religions that neglected dynamic historicity of religions. His theology of history of religions asserts that the revelation of Jesus Christ ist the eschatological preoccupation of the self-revelation of the divine reality on the basis of the theological-eschatological perspective and historical-dynamic perspective. In spite of different points of their theological history of religions, these are all monocentric because of the premise that religious experiences are originated and based by the ultimate One that is viewed and named as many other names and ideas in the history of religions. Also they pointed to the common goal of history of religions oriented to the One-God. However, those monocentric approach to the relationship of religions cannot reflect the differentiated truth-claims of neighboring religions as they are. Moreover it is not valid from the perspective of contemporary religious studies that regard the difference and peculiarity of each religion as inconvertible. Therefore, today's theology of religion should be deployed with multilateral centrism. This polycentric theology of religions sees critical dialogue on the base of the uniqueness and exclusivity of religious depth as vital and essential. Pursuing for the mutual maturity and richness, it is necessary to interact and compete with each other in the central axis of the depth of my religion and to recognize the differences without metaphysical view point that covers up them with common ground of the divine.

영어초록

The aim of this study is to propose a new model for the interreligious relationship by examining thoughts of Christian theologians who criticised the absoluteness of Christianity and explored a theology of history of religions. Ernst Troeltsch criticised the absoluteness of Christianity claimed from the point of view of dogmatism and speculative historical approach. But his criticism of the absoluteness of Christianity is taken from the point of historical approach to religions as religions. Instead of this point of view, his theological successor Tillich tried to reset the relationship of religions by attention to the relationship of revelation and religion. The revelation of Jesus Christ is the critical criterion of all religious experiences and practices including those of Christianity. Pannenberg criticised Troeltsch's viewpoint that neglected the theological point, while he also criticized Tillich's phenomenological approach to religions that neglected dynamic historicity of religions. His theology of history of religions asserts that the revelation of Jesus Christ ist the eschatological preoccupation of the self-revelation of the divine reality on the basis of the theological-eschatological perspective and historical-dynamic perspective. In spite of different points of their theological history of religions, these are all monocentric because of the premise that religious experiences are originated and based by the ultimate One that is viewed and named as many other names and ideas in the history of religions. Also they pointed to the common goal of history of religions oriented to the One-God. However, those monocentric approach to the relationship of religions cannot reflect the differentiated truth-claims of neighboring religions as they are. Moreover it is not valid from the perspective of contemporary religious studies that regard the difference and peculiarity of each religion as inconvertible. Therefore, today's theology of religion should be deployed with multilateral centrism. This polycentric theology of religions sees critical dialogue on the base of the uniqueness and exclusivity of religious depth as vital and essential. Pursuing for the mutual maturity and richness, it is necessary to interact and compete with each other in the central axis of the depth of my religion and to recognize the differences without metaphysical view point that covers up them with common ground of the divine.

참고자료

· 없음